Really good.
Scott Kjar writes, "When a school has an anti-firearm policy, the policymakers are not the ones who must suffer the negative consequences. If a would-be killer arrives at school and discovers everyone else unarmed—students, faculty, and staff—the would-be killer is likely to be successful at creating mayhem and death. Yet the policymakers are not the ones at risk. The school board passes the policy, but the school board is not on the front lines next to the students, faculty, and staff when the would-be killer arrives. This is an example of moral hazard."
Applies to companies too.
Gun Control: An Economic Analysis | The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty
Winds of Change Blow Through Ukraine
7 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment